#45 - June 25, 2007, 3:23 p.m.
Q u o t e:
Now don't take this wrong way but if the 3rd party programmes are silly and inaccurate how come it took a huge long thread with stats and numbers for Nagrand to lose it's "Recommended".
It didn't. It took our own numbers from this weekend to come in and be evaluated.
Q u o t e:
Edit: Did you accidentally also ban the guy who made the post? :P
Hm, I don't remember who started that thread, but if he got suspended for spamming or such his posts may have been nuked (all posts deleted). However, I think that should ignore threads with blue tags, though I'd have to look into that (and suggest it if it doesn't).
Q u o t e:
i am wondering whether gohstlands/hellfire are going to get bombarded with new characters over the next few weeks as nagrand has and prehaps it would be a good idea to give them both the recomended tag so people have more of a choice?
We aim to have the tag on at least 2 realms at a time to avoid one realm jumping very much up in population. Unfortunately Nagrand ended up being the only recommended PvE realm for a while, which is not supposed to happen and will be avoided as much as possible in the future.
Q u o t e:
Btw.. Making L1/L10 alts clearly works to fill the servers.. Who's with me?
Won't work. We don't look at the number of characters, but at the concurrency.