Kalgan lied to Ret paladins

#0 - Oct. 11, 2007, 10:55 p.m.

From Blizzcon:
Q: Ret Pallies have to rely on too many stats to be effective. Will there be more of a focus on a few stats instead of being watered down on all?
A: Yes, stat distribution will be changed for the Paladin -- totally agree. Reliance on Spell Damage specifically will be lessened.

From less than 2 weeks ago:

Originally Posted by Kalgan
Quote:*Raises Hand-recorder*

Q: Mr. Kalgan, care to comment on the lack of mention for the Ret paladin threat reduction?!

A: We'll make sure to mention something on that topic soon (although possibly not today).

Kalgan's post was deleted soon afterward, and both he and the CM's have been silent on the subject since then.

Maybe Retribution Paladins wouldn't be protesting right now if we hadn't been so obviously lied to/ignored.

Drysc

#86 - Oct. 12, 2007, 1:38 a.m.

We've given Retribution Paladins some nice damage increases in 2.3, and we're going to be keeping an eye on those changes and what other adjustments they may require. We're still looking at the possibility of a passive threat reduction, but we want to see how the changes we have look and play before making any final decision.

I never saw, nor believe there was any mention that any threat reduction changes were promised, or specifically said to be coming in 2.3. Aside from that, not all of our plans to make game changes are "right now" or "the next patch". I know it's easy to make those assumptions because that's what's convenient, but it's just not always the case. Things can change, game development does evolve, especially in an environment such as an MMO.

I think I'm getting a bit pessimistic, that doesn't necessarily apply here, but I'm trying to impress upon you that things can and often do change. Saying we agree with something doesn't mean the change can be made right away, and looking into something certainly doesn't mean we're making a change.

Sometimes we do need to be able to express that we'll be looking into something without being verbally assaulted when the outcome doesn't meet chimeric expectations. If there's any question on why we may take various tactics in communicating with everyone, including limiting how and when we do so, this would be a great example.