Q u o t e:
I would "choose"... the second! Wonder why?
Q u o t e:
I do Pve dps with 2handed sword but i need TM as the better crits come from overpower and with that slow weapon, without Tm, beeing in zerk stance 90% of the time i probably won't get rage in time to overpower..
Don't u find for PVe dmg Berserker stance a bit better with the 3% crit? If u do Imp overpower has no sense wihtout TM.
Q u o t e:
This post proves my point that most of the Blizz warrior Devs have no idea how to play warriors. What kind of IDIOT puts 2 points in improved execute instead of improved Intercept?
Q u o t e:
Time spent not hitting the mob is damage lost. Intercept helps you with this in many, many fights.
That said, personally I'd probably get both, or perhaps imp. slam in case they solve the global cooldown issue.
Q u o t e:
(to blue) But you are completely ignoring the fact that your PAYING CUSTOMERS in their hundreds, if not thousands, are telling you that moving TM to the prot key is the WRONG move. When something like 95% of the Warriors who post on these boards (both here and in the US) have told you and other blues that the TM move is a major major nerf, and yet the situation is ignored, or warriors are foisted off with glib platitudes that are basically untrue ("warriors at are the top of the food chain in pvp") - what do you expect people to think?
Q u o t e:
CREZAX:
So you basically want flurry without beeing able to switch to battlestance to procc it with overpower.
You "chose" an end game dps build without TM?
yepp, warriors are blessed with skilled CMs...
Q u o t e:
Basically, any fight where you either need/want to stun targets or fight multiple mobs that are being tanked in different locations, or simply happen to feared/stunnet/rooted/snared away from your target. As you may understand, the list is too big to mention here. :)
Q u o t e:
4/5 Iron Will and 1/1 Anger Management instead of 5/5 Iron Will. This is because AM generates 20 rage a minute which is just as much as Improved Berserker Rage does, which is worth more than 3% stun/charm resistance.
Q u o t e:
Improved Heroic Strike over 5/5 Deflection might also be worth it for a dps spec, but until we know exactly how much bonus damage it will do against dazed targets, it's hard to say. Full deflection isn't that great for a PvE dps warrior.
Q u o t e:
4/5 Imp. Battle Shout and 2/2 Imp. Intercept will probably benefit you more than an extra 7-10 attack power or such would do. This is assuming you use intercept often, both for the stun and for getting into melee. This way you can also keep 2/2 Imp. Execute.
Q u o t e:
Crezax:
have you ever played serius PvP with a warrior?
beacaus you can not do that without minimum 2/5 TM (even thou i prefere more).
i know you maby cant make the dev change their minds, but maby you could atleast do something, beacaus i feel that my warrior is geting more and more nerfed. and i do not think Blizzard gives me the anser exactly WHY they do it. for PvP warrior TM is not a Choice, its vital!
i feel that being forced in to a prot spec without geting answers just suckk, and that is a reason i rerolled to a warlock (and i always wanted to try 1). warriors to me, is all abuout being good in 1vs1 combat (all combat overall) but atm we just suck in 1 vs 1. with a healer we can be good, but not all warriors have a priest hidden in their pocket.
if maby you could somehow tell the devs. how we warriors feel i would be gratefull, beacaus i feel ignored.
Q u o t e:
Hi Crezax! Thanks for stopping by :)
I only have 1 question for you, actually. Hope you find the time to reply.
Now, I have looked at your builds and you confirmed mine and many other peoples grievances:
In your two builds combined, you have put a total of 1! in the new talents. Doesn't that prove that it has failed, from a PvE perspective?
