#23 - 2011/03/14 06:14:00 PM
Thank you very much for the excellent questions and further discussion.
03/11/2011 7:38 PMPosted by
Naidi Is there a possibility of getting an UnregisterAddonMessagePrefix?
At this time we don’t really see a need for an unregister function. If one arises we can add that functionality. Right now we wanted to mimic add-on loading/unloading.
03/12/2011 12:19 AMPosted by
Xinhuan Also, the client has a 512 prefix limit but the server only recognizes the first 64?
The difference between the client cap(512) and the server cap(64) are to allow us to raise the server cap (if we needed to), without a client patch.
03/12/2011 12:19 AMPosted by
Xinhuan What happens exactly if 513 prefixes are registered?
The client has a hard cap (ie: once full it will not accept any more prefixes).
03/12/2011 12:19 AMPosted by
Xinhuan What happens exactly if 65 prefixes are registered ?
The server cap is currently soft. If you exceed the server cap you will get all add-on messages (ie: just like it has always worked up to now).
The soft server cap is strictly for add-on author testing/debugging. It is not intended that an add-on would purposefully hit the soft cap in order to get "old functionality". If we see this system being abused we will make the server cap a hard cap, and limit the number of prefixes for all clients.